ACLU of Georgia Releases Report on Immigration Detention in Georgia

May 16th, 2012

Findings raise serious concerns about violations of detainees’ human and constitutional rights

ATLANTA – The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Georgia today released a comprehensive report on conditions of detention for immigrants in Georgia titled: “Prisoners of Profit: Immigrants and Detention in Georgia.”  The report covers the four immigration detention facilities in Georgia, which include the largest immigration detention center in the country, the Stewart Detention Center, as well as the North Georgia Detention Center, Irwin County Detention Center, and Atlanta City Detention Center.  Three of the facilities are operated by corporations. 

For purposes of this documentation project, the ACLU of Georgia interviewed 68 individuals who were detained in Georgia immigration detention facilities, as well as detainees’ family members and immigration attorneys.  The ACLU of Georgia also toured detention centers in Georgia and reviewed documents obtained from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other governmental agencies.

“This report documents serious abuses in Georgia detention centers requiring immediate action,” said Azadeh Shahshahani, National Security/Immigrants’ Rights Project Director with the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Georgia.  “The conditions documented by the ACLU of Georgia violate detainees’ constitutional and human rights as well as ICE standards.”

Findings raise serious concerns about violations of detainees’ due process rights, inadequate living conditions, inadequate medical and mental health care, and abuse of power by those in charge. 

The report recommends that ICE stop detaining immigrants at the for-profit Stewart and Irwin County Detention Centers given the extent of the documented violations as well as the facilities’ remote locations which isolate detainees from their families and communities of support.  The report also contains recommendations for improving conditions of detention for immigrants at the Atlanta City Detention Center, including providing outdoor recreation to detainees, and at the North Georgia Detention Center, including paying minimum wage to detainees who choose to enroll in the voluntary work program.

“The findings of the report confirm the problems inherent to detention of immigrants in privately-run, for-profit detention centers,” said Shahshahani.  “There is deep-seated tension between the profit-making aims of prison corporations and the American values of justice and liberty –humane conditions for those detained and release of immigrants who pose no danger or flight risk.”

The report can be viewed here: http://www.acluga.org/Prisoners_of_Profit.pdf

An updated fact sheet on immigration detention titled “Securely Insecure: The Real Costs, Consequences & Human Face of Immigration Detention” can be viewed here: http://www.acluga.org/ImmigrationDetentionFactSheet.pdf

Press Conference Wednesday – ACLU of Georgia to Release Report on Immigration Detention in Georgia

May 15th, 2012

ATLANTA – The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Georgia will hold a press conference on Wednesday, May 16 at 10 am EDT to announce release of report on conditions of detention for immigrants in Georgia titled: “Prisoners of Profit: Immigrants and Detention in Georgia.”

The report covers the four immigration detention facilities in Georgia, which include the Stewart Detention Center, North Georgia Detention Center, Irwin County Detention Center, and Atlanta City Detention Center.  The ACLU of Georgia interviewed 68 individuals who were detained in Georgia immigration detention facilities.  In addition, detainees’ family members and immigration attorneys were interviewed.  The ACLU of Georgia also toured detention centers in Georgia and reviewed documents obtained from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other governmental agencies through Freedom of Information Act requests.

At the press conference, findings of the report as well as conclusions and recommendations will be discussed.

WHAT:

Press conference to announce release of “Prisoners of Profit: Immigrants and Detention in Georgia”

WHEN:

Wednesday, May 16

10 am EDT

WHERE:

In front of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office, 180 Spring Street, SW, Atlanta

Copies of the report will be available at the press conference.

The ACLU of Georgia Releases Updated Frequently Asked Questions about HB 87

May 9th, 2012

As the first year anniversary of the signing into law of Georgia’s House Bill 87 approaches, the ACLU Foundation of Georgia today released an updated version of Frequently Asked Questions about the Georgia Racial Profiling Law.  The pamphlet includes information about the various sections of law and their implementation, the legal challenge, where the law now stands, as well as the negative impact of the law on Georgia’s economy and reputation.

Download the pamphlet

100 Stories ~ Building 100 Solutions for Securing the Education Pipeline for Georgia’s Children

April 23rd, 2012

Has your school been named a Priority or Focus school?

Concerned about the recently released graduation and/or discipline rates at your school?

Join us to learn about improving the learning environment and educational outcomes
in your child’s school.

Saturday, May 5th; 9:30am-12:30pm

at

Meadowcreek High School

4455 Steve Reynolds Boulevard

Norcross, Georgia  30093

Agenda Highlights:

  • Specific Local Community Demographics/Statistics
  • How to Navigate the School System
  • Tools of Parent Engagement
  • Effective Discipline Models

Join us in this community collaboration!

Register at www.gwinnettstopp.org

For more information: info@GwinnettSTOPP.org or 404-590-7877

complimenatry light refreshments will be served

download flyer

Georgia Agrees to Comply with “Motor Voter Act,” in Settlement of ACLU Suit

April 19th, 2012

Suit Eases Path for Public Assistance Recipients to

Register to Vote

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 19, 2012

 

ATLANTA – Georgia has agreed to make it easier for people who receive food stamps, Medicaid and other public assistance to register to vote, in a settlement of a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups.

“This is what government in a democracy should be doing,” said Laughlin McDonald, director of the ACLU Voting Rights Project, “making sure that as many eligible people as possible have the ability to participate.  We’ve seen far too many attempts to keep people away from the ballot box this year.  With this settlement, at least, Georgia is moving in the right direction.”

The suit charged Georgia was violating the National Voter Registration Act, popularly known as the “motor voter act.” A provision of the law requires states to offer opportunities to register to vote at all offices that offer public assistance.

Under the agreement, Georgia will allow residents to register whenever they apply for, renew or change an address for an assistance program, regardless of whether they come to an office or contact an office over the phone, by mail, or over the Internet.

According to the lawsuit, voter registrations through assistance agencies in Georgia had dropped off drastically since the motor voter law went into effect in 1995.  In the first year of the new law, over 100,000 people applied to register through assistance agencies.  By 2009, only 4,430 did, even though 70,000 Georgians a month were applying for food stamps alone. 

The coalition that brought the suit also included the Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Demos, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Project Vote, the Coalition for the Peoples’ Agenda and the law firm Dechert LLP.

To read the settlement agreement, go to:

www.aclu.org/voting-rights/georgia-state-conferenceof-national-association-colored-people-et-al-v-kemp-et-al

Bill requiring drug test for welfare signed

April 17th, 2012

http://www.11alive.com/news/article/238379/40/Bill-requiring-drug-tests-for-welfare-signed

ATLANTA — Gov. Nathan Deal has signed legislation that would require some people applying for welfare in Georgia to pass a drug test before they could get benefits.

The bill passed the Legislature along partisan lines, with Democrats balking at the proposal as an unfair burden on the poor.

RELATED | Drug testing for welfare recipients passes Senate
MORE | Welfare recipients could face drug tests

Under the bill, anyone who tests positive for drug use could not apply for welfare for one month and until they test clean. A third violation could prevent someone from applying for benefits for a year. They would also have to pass another drug test before reapplying.

The results from the tests couldn’t be used to criminally prosecute people.

Courts have struck down similar laws in other states, although supporters in Georgia expressed confidence that the law here could withstand a legal challenge.

____________________

AGAINST THE NEW LAW:

Debbie Seagraves
ACLU Georgia

“It will be very, very expensive. Because every study that’s been done shows that people who are receiving assistance do not use drugs at a higher rate than people who are working. So most people will have to be reimbursed,” because, she said, the overwhelming majority of applicants — in the tens of thousands per year — will test negative and, under the new law, the cost of the test, at least $17, will be paid back to them when they test negative. “So the state is going to bear the cost.”

“It’s a violation of the Constitution.”

A court in Michigan has ruled a similar law unconstitutional, she said, and in Florida a judge issued a temporary injunction putting a similar law in Florida on hold. The Florida case will be heard by the federal appeals court in Atlanta.

“And that judge” in Florida “said there was no reason to believe that it was going to curtail drug use because there was no reason to believe that people were using drugs at a higher rate when they were getting assistance, and that is was unconstitutional, and that it [the challenge] was likely to win in court.”

“It’s requiring suspicion-less searches. It’s one thing to require a drug test of someone who is suspected of using drugs. [But] these are people who are being blanket-tested, or who will be blanket-tested, with no suspicion, in order to receive a public benefit. A benefit that we have all paid for as taxpayers.”

Yes, she said, taxpayer money should not be used by welfare recipients who buy drugs, but taxpayer money should also not be used to conduct illegal, unconstitutional searches of innocent people.

“They are having a requirement put upon them to give up their bodily fluids, to be tested for drugs, when there is no reason to believe that they are drug users. So suspicion-less searches, and this is a search, suspicion-less drug testing is not a constitutional thing for the state to be doing” and regardless of how popular the plan is, she said, the Constitution forbids it.

“There’s no evidence that there is a high rate of drug use among TANF recipients. Any evidence that’s out there would tell you just the opposite.”

“What if our government — state, federal or local — just decided that we have a high rate of drug use across the board, and there is something wrong with that and so everybody is going to get tested? What if they said that, well, we need to have DNA samples of every citizen in this state in a database, and that way, when a crime’s committed, we can just pull it up and go get the right person? Are you okay with that? Suspicion-less searches, taking away the privacy of a human being, is prevented, it’s restricted in our Constitution. It’s prohibited in our Constitution. And, to say that someone, at the worst time in their life, they’re having to get TANF, they’re having to get assistance, during the worst recession that any of us remember, that we are now going to impose this punitive testing, it serves no purpose, it saves no money, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s just misdirected and mean.”

FOR THE NEW LAW:

Sen. John Albers
(R) Roswell

The new law is needed “To make sure that we get people clean.  And we never want to spend tax dollars on enabling people’s illegal activity.  Implement a little tough love, because ultimately the best way to serve people is to give them a hand up, not simply a hand out.”

The new law, Albers said, is not “red meat for the right wing” to pander to voters, as some critics have called the law.

“If anything, this is about as American as it becomes, which is doing the hard work, being accountable.  And we should never give one group an advantage over another in anything we do. I’m a volunteer firefighter. I have to take a drug test. In the private marketplace, for my job, I have to take a drug test. To have someone who receives a free government benefit to do the same is simply leveling the playing field. So I don’t believe that argument holds weight, we have worked very closely with legislators in Florida and our Attorney General’s office…. This is nothing about illegal search and seizure.”

“The average TANF or welfare recipient in the state of New Jersey spent 5.8 years in the system. However, if they were using illegal drugs, they spent 12 years, more than two times. So the state has a reason and a fiduciary responsibility to make sure that tax dollars are never going to be used for illegal purposes , and that we’re using the best use of taxpayer dollars for programs.”

Sen. Albers said statistics from Florida indicating that about five percent of welfare applicants test positive for drugs are inaccurate; he said the rate is closer to 13 percent. “If 13 percent of the people no longer get a government subsidy to fund their use of meth or cocaine or heroine or something terrible, then absolutely we’re doing the right thing. We would never take our tax dollars and go hand it to somebody to go break the law. It’s just wrong.”

“This is good government. And true compassion is doing what’s best for people, not easiest. Tough love works, and it’s time we (had) a little tough love in the state of Georgia.”

Georgians must pass drug test to get welfare benefits

April 17th, 2012

http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/17468692/georgians-must-pass-drug-test-to-get-welfare-benefits

ATLANTA (CBS ATLANTA) -

People applying for welfare in Georgia will have to pass a drug test before receiving benefits. Gov. Nathan Deal signed the controversial bill into law Monday.

“The basic premise is people who are receiving taxpayers money should be clean,” said Deal

Deal signed House Bill 861, requiring parents to have to pass a drug test before receiving benefits. The law was created to make sure money going to low-income families with kids actually gets to the kids.

“The intention, of course, is to try to make sure we’re not spending taxpayers money for things that were not intended, namely to support someone’s drug habit,” said Deal.

Under the law, if someone fails the drug test, they have to wait a month and take another test.

They are ineligible for benefits for 3-months after a second failure and the third time, a person will have to wait a year to re-apply for benefits.

“To do this was punitive and unconstitutional,” said Debbie Seagraves, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Seagraves believes the law violates people’s rights and unfairly targets people who have fallen on hard economic times.

“It’s patently unconstitutional to conduct suspicion-less searches on people just because they are applying for public benefits,” said Seagraves.

Taxpayers are split on the law.

“It’s just like saying that whoever’s on welfare is doing drugs or has something to hide, so it’s placing a stigmatism on there that shouldn’t be there,” said taxpayer Shonte Henderson.

“I know we should help the people but I think they need to have a drug test because people out there are using the opportunity the wrong way,” said Aysen  Maney.

Florida has been sued over a similar law but Deal thinks this one will stand in court.

“I think the intention is good and hopefully the implementation process is workable,” said Deal.

The state of Georgia could face a lawsuit. Kathryn Hamoudah with the Southern Center for Human Rights said, “This legislation faces numerous obstacles before implementation, and if implemented, there will be litigation to face.”

The law goes into effect July 1.

Groups File FOIA for ICE Data on Georgia Deportations as Region Ranks First in Deporting Parents

April 17th, 2012

April 17, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FOIA Request to Shine Light on Georgia Police/ICE Collaboration via Secure Communities and 287(g)

Atlanta, GA.- The Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights (GLAHR), The ACLU Foundation of Georgia, and the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) will file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) today for previously unavailable data on the relationship between local law enforcement agencies across the state and the deportation of Georgia residents by ICE.

GLAHR cites the climate of hostility created by HB87 and the recent statewide activation of the federal deportation program, Secure Communities, for contributing to the recent ICE data indicating that the ICE Atlanta region (including GA, NC, and SC) deports nearly double the rate of parents of US citizens than any other region in the country.

WHO: GLAHR, ACLU Foundation of Georgia, and NDLON

What: Press Conference on Filing of FOIA to obtain documents shedding light on police/ICE collaboration

When: April 17th, 2012 – 11:00 AM

Where: ICE Atlanta office, 180 Spring Street SW, Atlanta 30303

###

http://www.acluga.org/FOIA-PressRelease2012.pdf

link to FOIA Request

How One Georgia Town Gambled Its Future on Immigration Detention

April 12th, 2012

http://www.thenation.com/article/167312/how-one-georgia-town-gambled-its-future-immigration-detention

Research support for this article was provided by the Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute and the Puffin Foundation.

About a mile from the center of Ocilla, Georgia, a two-stoplight town nearly 200 miles south of Atlanta, sits a bleak boxy building surrounded by barbed-wire fencing. A hand-painted sign reads “Irwin County Detention Center.” With 1,200 beds, this private prison is the largest employer in Irwin, a county of 10,000 people. For years it did good business, bringing much-needed jobs to this impoverished part of south Georgia.

But by the middle of 2009 the prison sat nearly half empty. It needed more inmates to keep the business afloat. The facility’s private management company, and the county, began to court today’s most lucrative detention market: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, otherwise known as ICE.

ICE runs the world’s largest immigration detention system, relying heavily on local jails and private facilities in far-flung communities like Irwin County. Rather than operating them itself, the agency leases beds from local jails or contracts with private corporations, such as Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group, billion-dollar companies that spend millions on federal lobbying to ensure that the market stays strong. Private companies also inspect and monitor prospective and contracted prisons on ICE’s behalf. These entities are responsible for the health and welfare of more than 33,000 immigrant detainees each day. Immigrants who are detained before deportation can spend anywhere from a few hours to years in custody.

Deportations have reached record levels under President Barack Obama, and demand for detention facilities has increased. Starting in 2002, ICE had funding for 19,444 beds per year, according to an ICE report. Today, ICE spends about $2 billion per year on almost twice the number of beds.

ICE’s reliance on facilities like the Irwin County Detention Center has put small rural towns at the center of one of today’s most contentious policy arguments—how to enforce immigration law. A yearlong investigation by The Nation shows how much politics has come to rule detention policy. Even as Georgia and Alabama passed harsh new immigration laws last year designed to keep out undocumented immigrants, documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act reveal that politicians from both states were lobbying hard to bring immigrant detainees in. ICE succumbed to the pressure, sending hundreds of detainees to the financially unstable facility in Georgia that promised to detain immigrants cheaply. That promise came at the expense of the health, welfare and rights to due process of some 350 immigrants detained daily in Ocilla.

* * *

Last June, Irwin County Commissioner Joey Whitley sat in his office in Ocilla. He had a lot on his mind. A brutal drought had raged for weeks, drying out the fields in this farming community. The county was negotiating an increasingly slim budget. And the detention center was on the verge of default.

The county’s survival was deeply intertwined with the detention center. Five years earlier, Irwin County had helped the owners secure funding to renovate the prison, in return for what officials thought would be a steady flow of revenue. Instead, the facility was now more than one-third empty and over $750,000 behind on its taxes. Profits were nowhere to be found. About a hundred jobs were at risk.

The end of the legislative session that May had created another problem. Nathan Deal, Georgia’s Republican governor, signed HB 87, one of the toughest immigration laws in the country. Thousands of migrant workers who traveled to the fields each year had bypassed Georgia altogether. Irwin County felt the impact. Local businesses, like the laundromat and the grocery store, were hurting because Latino residents were afraid to leave their homes. Meanwhile, millions in crops were at risk.

The solution to both problems seemed to be immigrants. Irwin County needed more in the fields. But it also needed more detainees to fill the prison.

Filling the detention center would be “good for everybody,” said Whitley. “It’s a good facility. We just need some inmates to keep it up and running.… It’d be a terrible loss if it closed.”

“We would get by,” he added. “But it would really hurt.”

Whitley knew. It had closed before. The Irwin County Detention Center had gone through several iterations, holding US Marshals Service detainees in the early 1990s and then operating as a youth boot camp for a few years. The building sat unused until it was purchased in 2004 by Terry O’Brien, whose company, Municipal Corrections, had been incorporated that year. Soon thereafter, the prison reopened, under the operating control of a former deputy sheriff named Michael Croft and his company, Michael Croft Enterprises. The prison was used to house inmates from other counties, whose lockups were full to capacity.

O’Brien and Croft convinced Irwin County that a bigger facility would attract federal customers and pushed for an expansion. In 2007 the county floated $55 million in lease revenue bonds—which do not require taxpayer approval—to nearly double the number of beds. Theoretically, revenue from the additional inmates, generated by daily, per-prisoner rates paid by the federal government—would bring in profit.

But the renovated detention center, which reopened in January 2009, did not make enough profit to both meet its huge biannual payments to bondholders and pay its bills. By the middle of 2009, the Irwin County Detention Center was running deep in the red. People in Ocilla said Croft left town suddenly. Last they heard, he was somewhere out in Texas.

That summer, a new company, Detention Management LLC, took over operations, partnering with Municipal Corrections. O’Brien became a member of its management team. Executives promised to exploit their connections in Georgia and in Washington, DC, to attract ICE’s business and turn the detention center around. County leaders were hopeful. As Hazel McCranie, president of the Ocilla-Irwin Chamber of Commerce, put it, “You’ve got to go out and get a contract with ICE. That’s your salvation.”

* * *

Detention Management’s website lists five leaders: Terry O’Brien, Robert “Skip” McLean Fuller, Charles “Bud” Black, Tony Turpin and Thomas C. Rapone. None have much experience running immigrant detention facilities, but they do have long histories in the corrections industry—histories tainted by myriad scandals, including pay-to-play schemes and accusations of inmate abuse.

In 2002, the name Charles “Bud” Black surfaced in a pay-to-play scandal that rocked the state’s powerful Board of Pardons and Paroles. Detention Management Services, a private probation company Black co-owned, had in March 2000 paid board member Bobby Whitworth thousands of dollars in “consulting” fees to push a law that would benefit private probation companies. Whitworth was convicted of public corruption; Black was never charged—he sold the company before the scandal broke. In 2006 he founded the similarly named Detention Management LLC.

In 2001 Tony Turpin lost his post as a regional director of the Georgia Department of Corrections for spending $16,000 in unapproved state funds to renovate his home. He later served as warden of Lee Arrendale State Prison, which became notorious after an 18-year-old prisoner was found raped and strangled to death in his cell block in 2004. “It is not a dangerous, out-of-control facility,” Turpin told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that year. “Do incidents occur? Sure they do.”

Thomas C. Rapone was known in Irwin County as Detention Management’s “Washington man.” After a long career as a US Marshal and Massachusetts public safety commissioner, he served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of Correctional Services Corporation, once a major company that ran juvenile and adult detention facilities across the United States.

Correctional Services Corporation had a reputation for scandal: including the holding of juvenile inmates long after their release date, abuse of immigrant detainees and pay-to-play schemes. During Rapone’s tenure as CSC’s chief operating officer, state and federal agencies launched several investigations into the company. In 2003, New York State fined CSC $300,000 for failing to report meals, trips and other gifts purchased for more than a dozen elected officials in exchange for contracts. During another investigation that year, former Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich considered severing the state’s contract with the company after reports accused staff members of sexually abusing and intentionally intoxicating inmates at a juvenile detention center.

Detention Management did not respond to repeated requests to be interviewed for this article. When asked whether the record of its top executives aligned with agency standards, ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said, “It would be inappropriate for ICE comment on this issue.” It would also be inappropriate, she said, to comment on any concerns about sending detainees to a failing private prison.

* * *

The Irwin County Detention Center offered ICE a particular bargain—a point state politicians reiterated in letters courting the agency. “ICE currently houses detainees with private providers at a price of $69.00 to $90.00 per day in Georgia,” wrote Representative Jack Kingston, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee, in September 2010. “ICDC is prepared to charge significantly less than the current rate, only $45.00 per detainee per day. This cost reduction will result in annual savings of over $10 million to the Department and the taxpayer.” Conservative Republican Senator Johnny Isakson also wrote letters on behalf of the Irwin County Detention Center after the detention center’s warden contacted his office, and met personally with senior ICE officials to push them to send detainees there.

Initially, ICE officials seemed reluctant. E-mails obtained through open records requests showed they were concerned about the detention center’s distance from legal services and ICE staff. On September 20, 2010, Atlanta Field Office Director Felicia Skinner received an e-mail from the ICE Congressional liaison’s office in Washington that said that if “this idea gets pushed hard enough by the right people,” ICE could be pressured to use Irwin “more than we planned…. Where those bodies come from is anybody’s guess.”

The concerns coming from Washington echoed those of the ACLU and others about housing detainees in rural prisons. “The main problem I would see for us using Irwin as a long-term high-population facility relates to conducting weekly visitation by the Detained Unit, the service of documents, court, etc., due to not having staff on-site or near the facility,” read the e-mail from an official whose name was redacted.

But political pressure seemed to win out. On December 9, 2010, Senator Isakson sat down with Beth Gibson, ICE’s assistant deputy director, and Gary Mead, executive director for enforcement and removal operations, along with staff from the office of Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss. Senator Isakson wanted ICE to guarantee it would keep at least a hundred beds full at the Irwin County Detention Center.

He suggested the agency start by immediately transferring female detainees from the Etowah County Detention Center in Alabama, a rural lockup a 300-mile drive from Irwin County. The facility has a long history of human rights issues. In a recent report, the Women’s Refugee Commission cited the facility’s “inhumane conditions.” Detainees are not allowed in-person visitations—half-hour visits with friends and family take place through a video monitor. They lack access to lawyers and many have reported inadequate food. Human rights monitors would hear similar complaints when they began visiting the Irwin County Detention Center.

Weeks before Christmas, ICE’s Atlanta field office told Etowah County officials that it planned to move their detainees to Georgia. Officials at Etowah were incensed. The county had been detaining immigrants for over a decade, bringing in $5.2 million a year in revenue. For the next few months, according to ICE records, Alabama politicians met with high-ranking ICE officials, including director John Morton, while Georgia politicians held phone conferences with ICE. Trying to work out a deal that would satisfy both states, ICE officials passed e-mails back and forth. The issue was not what facility would best detain these immigrants safely but how to best avoid political blowback.

While Georgia had many important people lobbying for the Irwin facility, Alabama politicians sat on the appropriations committees in both houses of Congress, giving them a firm hold on ICE’s purse strings. Alabama Representative Robert Aderholt, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee and chairs its Subcommittee on Homeland Security, met numerous times with ICE officials. Even the Etowah County Sheriff flew to DC to try to stop ICE from pulling out.

Elliot Williams, one of ICE’s legislative liaisons, sent an e-mail to Mead with a solution that could please everyone. “We can move a hundred women out of etowah [sic], and replace them with a hundred others,” Williams wrote. “Not a zero-sum issue.” According to e-mails, ICE would simply find more “bodies” to fill the beds.

Aderholt would see that there was money to do it. In March 2011, ICE Director Morton sat before the House Subcommittee, hands clasped before him on the heavy wooden table. Morton listened as Representative Aderholt, flanked by members of the committee, reiterated his commitment to funding ICE detention.

“Dollars are scarce in Washington these days,” Aderholt said. “But I’m proud to say that this budget request does not cut funds for illegal immigrant detention space. As chairman of this subcommittee, I pledge to you that we will fund every dollar needed to house and detain illegal immigrants in order to keep them off the streets.” He urged Morton “to ensure that these dollars are used wisely and that we get the most out of each and every dollar.”

E-mails show that ICE read between the lines. “I do not believe we will be allowed to leave Etowah without serious repercussions against our budget,” Mead wrote to senior ICE officials on March 29, a few weeks after the appropriations meeting.

In the end, ICE agreed to send long-term detainees to Alabama from New Orleans. The Irwin County Detention Center got some detainees from Alabama, and the new flow would also keep Etowah County cells full. Representatives from both states were appeased.

* * *

Meanwhile, in Irwin County, a financial crisis was coming to a head. The prison could not pay its bills to the county or to investors who held the municipal bonds that helped finance it. It also owed hundreds of thousands in back taxes to the city and county. Despite this, Terry O’Brien insisted that things were improving; every few weeks, he wrote optimistic letters to investors that promised the facility would be filled.

In a bid to force Municipal Corrections to pay its back taxes, Irwin County’s Board of Commissioners voted to initiate foreclosure proceedings against the prison. The county had already borrowed $400,000 from a local bank to cover its operating expenses. Either the detention center paid what it owed or the county could take over and sell off the property for the amount of the debt. Bondholders too were fed up, and sent a consultant to review operations at the detention center.

On January 9, 2012, Irwin County attorney Warren Mixon faced Municipal Corrections in court. The company now owed about $1.6 million in back taxes and penalties. The relationship between the town and the detention center, once so promising, had gone sour.

The judge sided with Irwin County, which would allow officials to put the facility up for auction. But just days before the county was to list the sale, bondholders forced the company into bankruptcy in a Las Vegas court, blocking it. The county, along with bondholders, has hired a lawyer in Nevada. May is the earliest the county could receive its money.

In February, Mixon said that he heard rumblings that a few people may be interested in buying the facility—and even companies that have expressed no interest could still purchase it. “A lot of the big prison management groups, they may just be sitting back, waiting to pounce,” he said. Despite its long history of failed prisons, Ocilla could end up with yet another detention center if the facility goes up for auction. And in a county that is still strapped for jobs and cash, people would likely welcome it in.

* * *

Throughout months of negotiations over dollars and bodies, the detainees living in the Irwin County Detention Center remained unheard. If the prison closes, these men and women will be shipped to other facilities in Georgia. But if it remains open, officials in charge will have to grapple with conditions that have grown intolerable.

Detainees have long petitioned ICE monitors for better food and more prompt medical care. Complaints have been passed along to the warden, who has promised in several e-mails to remedy issues. By the end of 2011, detainees had waited long enough.

“On January 14, 2012, 4 Ice detainees from Fox 4 were sent to the hole because they refused to eat the food served on that day,” read a typed statement detainees sent out to friends, family and advocates. “The hole” is solitary confinement; the report said detainees had refused to eat for three days.

In response to the hunger strike, the thirty-two detainees from that unit were locked down in their cells for several days. According to interviews with detainees and family, detainees could not go to the legal library or to the commissary, where those with the means often bought food to supplement, or replace, meals.

Food has been the salient issue for months. Over the course of nearly a year, detainees has told officials that they were hungry. “We’re fed like dogs,” said Florent Firmin Kalonji Kalala, who has been at Irwin since September. “I just feel humiliated—that’s the feeling I have everyday.”

Kalala, 31, was born in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and raised in Côte d’Ivoire. In 1998, he arrived in Atlanta, learned English, and a few years later graduated from Mercer University. After a few years in Canada he returned to Atlanta, and later managed a popular bar and lounge. He and his girlfriend had a child. Last June, he was stopped for a traffic violation, which revealed an outstanding DUI charge in another county from years before. He pleaded guilty, was jailed, and in September, was moved into ICE custody and sent to Irwin County, where he became an ICE detainee known best by his five-digit inmate number.

On January 25, Kalala and several other members of their cell block, Fox 9, held their own hunger strike. For three days, they refused to eat. But little changed. A few days later, Kalala was put in the facility’s segregation unit, reportedly for yelling, “I’m just tired of his place,” in front of an officer. He remained there for twenty-seven days.

Kalala said he has been denied regular medical care for his high blood pressure, and that mice scurry into his cell at night. This is unconfirmed, in part because when human rights observers from the ACLU of Georgia toured the facility last September, officials barred them from seeing the segregation unit where Kalala was later held. “It makes us think, ‘What is the issue?’ ” said Azadeh Shahshahani, director of the Immigrant’s Rights Project at the Georgia ACLU.

In response to questions about hunger strikes and other complaints, Christensen, the ICE spokesperson, said that detainees are fed three hot meals a day. A dietitian reviews the meal plan annually, she said, and detainees have access to a law library at least five hours a week. She added that after reports of slow delivery of dental care, the detention center has implemented efforts to track medical and dental referrals, “to ensure the timely delivery of care to ICE detainees.”

But human rights advocates, immigrant detainees and their families still question why ICE began to use this remote facility at all.

“From the beginning when detainees were being placed at this facility the question we posed for ICE was ‘How come?’ ” Shahshahani said. “We never were provided a clear answer. It was just silence.”

Georgia’s Statewide Undocumented Students College Ban Fails

March 30th, 2012

Colorlines.com
by Julianne Hing

When the clock struck midnight last night signaling the end of the 2012 legislative session in Georgia, the state passed an important milestone.

“This is the first year in many years where no anti-immigrant measures passed in Georgia,” said Azadeh Shahshahani, director of the Immigrant Rights Project at the ACLU of Georgia.

But it might have been a very different story. Georgia was considering, and had quickly advanced, a bill that would have expanded the state’s ban on undocumented students entering public colleges and universities to the entire state network. It was to be Georgia’s update to its anti-immigrant law HB 87, which is currently being challenged in the courts alongside Arizona’s SB 1070.

Currently, undocumented students are barred from enrolling in the Georgia’s top five most competitive colleges.

SB 458, which also included a provision that would have made foreign passports an unacceptable form of idea, breezed the Senate and easily cleared a House panel, but died at the end of the session last night when it never made it to the House floor.

On Wednesday, Georgia state Sen. Barry Loudermilk, the author of the college ban provision, removed it from SB 458 because it was “stalling the bill,” the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported. The provision updating forms of acceptable ID was still in the bill, however. Immigrant rights advocates said these provisions were clearly designed to attack the rights of undocumented immigrants; if passed, it would have blocked undocumented immigrants from accessing basic utilities and even marriage licenses.

“Thankfully, [SB 458] died last night,” Shahshahani said.

http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/03/georgias_statewide_undocumented_students_college_ban_fails.html